CCO-PTF-CIP-SZH
Comprehensive system: a design or vision for a whole economy, scored as its own sources specify it. Code CCO.
CCO-PTF-CIP-SZH combines four components: CCO is Creative Currency Octaves, PTF is Public Trust Foundations, CIP is Citizens Internet Portal, and SZH is Social Zone Harmonization. Also referred to in the literature as Compassionism.
Designed by Duke Johnson, one of NEEC's two authors. The disclosure says how the project handles this.
17.5 of 29 (60%), 0 structural failures, Potentially Adequate. Rank 1 of 23 on equal weights.
By domain
Material Security
3.5 of 6 = 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5
C1.1Poverty Elimination Capacity0.5, partial · evidenceC1.2aWealth Building for Resilience1.0, pass · evidenceC1.2bPrevention of Exploitative Accumulation0.5, partial · evidenceC1.3Housing Security0.5, partial · evidenceC1.4Automation Resilience0.5, partial · evidenceC1.5Universal Wealth Access0.5, partial · evidence
Human Autonomy
4.0 of 6 = 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5
C2.1Freedom from Coercion0.5, partial · evidenceC2.2Labor Non-Necessity1.0, pass · evidenceC2.3Creative Development Opportunities0.5, partial · evidenceC2.4Democratic Participation0.5, partial · evidenceC2.5Exit Rights and Mobility1.0, pass · evidenceC2.6Civil Liberties and Rule of Law0.5, partial · evidence
System Resilience
4.0 of 6 = 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 + 0.5
C3.1Crisis Response Capacity0.5, partial · evidenceC3.2Inflation Control Mechanisms1.0, pass · evidenceC3.3Multi-Failure Resistance0.5, partial · evidenceC3.4Epistemic Adaptability1.0, pass · evidenceC3.5Failure-Mode Transparency0.5, partial · evidenceC3.6Productive and Innovative Capacity0.5, partial · evidence
Ethical Integrity
3.0 of 6 = 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5 + 0.5
C4.1Intergenerational Justice0.5, partial · evidenceC4.2Ecological Compliance0.5, partial · evidenceC4.3Group Equity0.5, partial · evidenceC4.4Power Distribution0.5, partial · evidenceC4.5Exploitation Elimination0.5, partial · evidenceC4.6Harm Internalization0.5, partial · evidence
Implementation Viability
3.0 of 5 = 0.5 + 0.5 + 1.0 + 0.5 + 0.5
C5.1Proven Component Foundation0.5, partial · evidenceC5.2Staged Transition Pathways0.5, partial · evidenceC5.3Partial and Parallel Deployability1.0, pass · evidenceC5.4Political Coalition Potential0.5, partial · evidenceC5.5Cultural Adaptability0.5, partial · evidence
Close calls
The scoring document registers these scores as calls a reasonable scorer could set differently.
| Criterion | Scored | Alternative | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
C1.2a | 1.0 | 0.5 | stated |
C2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | stated |
C3.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | stated |
C3.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | stated |
C5.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | stated |
Resolved together, they give:
| Reading | Total | Failures | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| As scored | 17.5 | 0 | Potentially Adequate |
| Every flagged call resolved upward | 18.0 | 0 | Potentially Adequate |
| Every flagged call resolved downward | 15.5 | 0 | Potentially Adequate |
Evidence
NEEC v1 scores re-estimated on the v2.0 criteria by the rescoring pass (NEEC_Rescoring_s37.md to NEEC_Rescoring_s65.md), the three new criteria scored in Session 65, re-read blind in Sessions 71 to 77 (NEEC_BlindReview_s71.md to NEEC_BlindReview_s77.md), with the owner's decisions 79.1 to 79.4 (NEEC_OwnerDecisions_s79.md), applied by apply_owner_s79.py; provisional until the outside review and Report and Paper v2.0.
The evidence report for this system has one section for each criterion: the score, the reading of each clause with its source, the close call if there is one, and links to the exact line of the published rationale and of the rescoring record that read it.
The full text is in the scoring documents: